I know there’s somebody in every agency doing the exact same
work I do, but I don’t know them. I’d like to see if other people have better
ways to do the job, and I wouldn’t mind sharing (showing off) some solutions
I’ve worked out. I found an online group for people who do the same work as me,
but there hadn’t been any postings to it for years, and when I posted
introducing myself nobody replied. I could put in the effort to try to find
people doing my job in other agencies and build community, but I don’t want to
waste my time if people aren’t going to participate. What makes a professional community
Signed, Vox Clamantis in Deserto
The abandoned online group you found is not unusual. There is lots of free and easy-to-use technology for groups, ranging from old fashioned email lists to social media. But if members don’t post questions and information that others are interested in, then the community fades into inactivity. Go ahead with your impulse to revive your professional community. There are some research findings that can help you make it a success.
I thought I was in a great innovation project, but then it
fell apart. Three years ago, our agency head announced we were going to be a
data-driven organization. I became my branch’s representative to the task force
she created to make that happen. It was exciting. We held workshops with all
parts of the agency, came up with as-is and to-be descriptions of how we use
data, and gave a briefing for the agency head. She said we had done great work.
But after that, when we wanted to move forward and implement parts of the to-be
vision, we couldn’t get management to focus on it. Now we have a new agency
head, and his chief of staff told us they are working on other priorities. I
feel like all my effort was wasted. How can I tell whether an innovation
project will really get results, before I invest my time and enthusiasm in it?
Thank you so much for your thought-provoking piece of 2 October [Dear Bureaucrat, How can I win arguments against lawyers?]. I saw much to remind me of the need for “judicial restraint” and active listening when counseling clients.
If I may take exception to one small point – lawyers recoil when a client argues, “But we have always done it that way,” or the milder version, “No one complained last time.” Indeed, even if the individual advancing this (specious) argument is an attorney, it sets my spidey-sense tingling.
If I must say “what the law is,” I must acknowledge the fluid (i.e. living) nature of jurisprudence and law. That is, what may have passed muster on previous occasions may not this time. I also can affirm that lawyers, like everyone else, are willing to accept certain levels of risky behavior. We want to align with our client in some instances and other times we steer him or her away from even the perception of malfeasance.
Thank you once again for your column. I frequently share it with colleagues and clients alike.
Lots of the people I deal with at work are lawyers. I’m not;
I have an MPA and experience in government. But whenever there’s an issue about
how to handle something in our agency, the bosses always side with the lawyers.
It’s like they see the lawyers as adult supervision for the rest of us. How can
I convince the bosses what’s best for our mission when the lawyer at the table
is raising trivial objections?
I am a civilian employee of the Department of the Army, in the electronics shop as an electronic mechanic. When we changed commands, my mission went away. Our command says we no longer work on that equipment. I now essentially have no mission, no job. However my leadership wants to be able to move me around and work in shops that need help. For instance, they would like me to work in a small arms shop for the next year to cover for a mission.
Do I have any rights to refuse them pushing me into work that is not on my position description and not related to what I was hired for? I don’t even care if they decide to get rid of me as long as they have to pay me severance (which I’m eligible for with 16 years service). I also have concerns over the repetitive work in small arms as I am a disabled veteran.
What rights do I have to refuse the work they want to assign me that is completely outside of my position?
Is it worth the hassle to apply for government jobs? I used to think working in government would be a way to do good in the world, have financial security, and get ahead. But the news is full of government doing terrible things, and people quitting so they won’t have to do terrible things, or being reassigned to force them to quit. I see people on social media bragging about how exciting their government jobs are, but nobody I know personally feels that way. Should I even bother trying to get in?
Signed, Not Winston Smith
Dear Not Winston,
There is an old image of what a government career can be: join an agency whose mission you believe in, get trained and advance within the agency, maybe to a top job, and retire with a pension and pride in a job well done. Even in the heyday of the civil service, most careers fell short of that ideal. But now it is even less realistic.
An anonymous reader points out that your annual evaluations could make the difference between keeping or losing your job if your agency has a Reduction in Force:
In your article titled, “Dear Bureaucrat, should I worry about my annual evaluation?” I noticed one very important piece of information was omitted from the response to the question. Federal employee annual performance ratings very much matter when a reduction in force occurs. The following article states, “Employees receive extra RIF service credit for performance based upon the average of their last three annual performance ratings of record received during the four-year period prior to the date the agency issues RIF notices.” That could be an important factor in the current federal employment environment.
According to OPM, reorganizations and furloughs can be subjected to the RIF rules, both of which are not uncommon in federal employment.